Main Logbooks page LST commissioning Shift checklists Safe state checklists Maintenance activities LST2-4 Commissioning Old logbooks
GENERAL CAMERA DRIVE ENERGY AMC
  LST1 Drive ELOG, Page 3 of 3  ELOG logo
ID Date Author Typeup Category Subject Status
  248   Wed Apr 17 21:26:13 2019 Drive Team- Ino&Thierry&Alessandro, SatoshiTelescope OperationsGeneralTracking for mirrors alignment 
  • Tracking at position :
    • RA = 101.288541 RA Offset = -0.6
    • DEC = -16.71343 DEC Offset = 0.7
  250   Thu Apr 18 21:07:20 2019 Drive Team- Ino&Thierry&AlessandroTelescope Operations TESTS Parkout Parkin for fixing the bolt issue 
  • Different ParkOut and Parkin done with different values for testing the torque limitation. 
    • By decreasing the torque and the position , the parkin failed because we are not in the CSS locking sensor (in locking position)
    • By setting back the original values, th parkin is ok but the bolt cannot be properly inserted.
  251   Thu Apr 18 21:21:25 2019 Drive Team- Ino&Thierry&AlessandroTelescope OperationsHardwareElevation limit switch issue 

The 2 swicthes are too far from the target at 56.48 elevation.  The sensor have been tuned in parkin position and the distance was correct (2mm) and at 56.48 is about 10mm. (impossible to tune correctly the sensor and the atrger has to be tuned)

  252   Fri Apr 26 23:17:07 2019 Alessandro for the drive teamTelescope OperationsIssuesdrive tracking issue 

We encountered a couple of issue with tracking

- When we tried to track on polaris coordinates (RA: 37.946143deg  Dec: 89.264138  AzOff=0.261  ZdOff=-0.359) the telescope started to move toward the east relatively fast (roughly ~5deg in less than 1 min) while it was supposed to basically stay on place. Some ephemerides evaluation close to the north pole doesn't seems work

- After ~1h 10m of tracking on Arcturus (RA: 213.913315deg  Dec 19.178249deg  AzOff=0.261  ZdOff=-0.359) we lost tracking. Apparently MOS did not crash (like previous time) so mistery remains. We simply re-start the tracking

- We do not fully understand how Az/Zd offset works.... we test the 2 offset Satoshi got with polaris....at the beginning the star was in the bottom left side of the WT....I added 1deg in azimuth and the star move to the center (so both in Az and zenith)...I go back to original values and the star stay in the same position...

  253   Thu May 30 13:18:04 2019 AlessandroTelescope Operations semi expert gui (marginal) issues 

- During shutter tests, we were requested to move the telescope many times between two positions at different zenith. Sometimes, once the position is reached and in the log I got the message 'GoToTelescopePosition Done received', the command panel stay stack with the "action in progress" bar without possibility to perform other atctions. I need to click to 'general abort' to stop the action and  get the panel comand back. It happened 3 times

- During tracking, the message on the screen switch from "tracking in progress" to "action in progress, please wait..." The latter is quite misleading for non-familiar user of the gui.

  257   Fri Jun 28 22:49:39 2019 Dirk HoffmannTelescope OperationsGeneralTelescope stuck 

After tracking Mk421, we abort current action (acknowledged) and try to go to a new source: RA=308.1, Dec=40.96. Drive Control refuses these parameters ("check your parameters").

General Abort without effect for 2 minutes. Called expert (Ino). He will look into it.

  258   Fri Jun 28 23:06:36 2019 Dirk HoffmannTelescope OperationsGeneralTelescope stuck 

Ino explained: MOS was totally desynchronised with PLC. (It was assuming that the telescope was parked.) He parked the telescope manually. Thanks!
Experts will investigate on Monday. But the shift crews can continue to use the  Drive Control and tracking.

Quote:

After tracking Mk421, we abort current action (acknowledged) and try to go to a new source: RA=308.1, Dec=40.96. Drive Control refuses these parameters ("check your parameters").

General Abort without effect for 2 minutes. Called expert (Ino). He will look into it.

 

  260   Wed Jul 3 21:02:09 2019 Dirk, Taka, Mitsunari, Yukiho, NoahTelescope OperationsIssuesFeedback from shiftcrew 

(For Thierry with love <3 :-)

The semi-expert drive control panel uses various terms for the zenith angle: "Altitude (zenith angle)", "Elevation", "Angle". "Zenith Angle". 
It would be less confusing, if only one and the same term were used over all places in the GUI.

After we issued the tracking command, giving RA/Dec, the GUI displayed

  • "Tracking in process" when the telescope was still moving, and the tracking point was not reached.
  • "Action in progress.Please wait ...", when the telescope was actually tracking.

We believe these two should be exchanged. Maybe even a colour code (yellow when still going to the tracking point, indicating that the telescop is not in nominal operation, and green when tracking is ongoing) could help the shiftcrew to understand in one glimpse where we are.

  262   Fri Jul 5 23:23:57 2019 Dirk, MoritzTelescope OperationsGeneralPark-in report 

On park-in command, telescope went to the right position 95/-1, but did not recognise that it was there.

  • Pushed Park-In again
  • Acknowledged one error
  • Then everything fine.
  263   Sat Jul 6 22:47:38 2019 Dirk HoffmannTelescope OperationsGeneralCar flash from road above+ 

When checking the telescope visually outside, while it was in the "park-out" position, a car happened to pass by from the upper road (coming from the other telescopes). Its lights flashed directly into the camera. It seems that the road is in direct prolongation of our current park-out position.

  • We saw the CAM HV going down several times in the park-out position (where the shutter is typically opened) during the last weeks. Can we change this standard position slightly (higher or lower)?
  • Another question is of course, why cars drive with lights on in that place. The "no luz larga" sign is below the MAGIC site, if I remember correctly.
  264   Sat Jul 6 23:17:54 2019 Moritz, DirkTelescope Operations Park-in problems 

When parking in the telescope, accidently hit "Shutdown" button instead of "Parkin" in Drive Semi-epert GUI. Nothing seem to happen for minutes despite telling command in progress "Shutdown"

Texted Drive experts, they told to just hit again the correct "Parkin" button.

Near the end of parkin in, procedure got stuck. Drive expert identified fuse Q21 having gone off. Switched back the fuse, acknowledged error, retried park in. Then, tower close. After expert intervention, did close and everything was fine.

  265   Tue Jul 9 00:46:52 2019 Mitsunari, Yukiho, Noah, MoritzTelescope OperationsIssuesPark-in problems 

At parking in, the telescope got stuck at 94.254°. We checked in the container that fuse Q21 went off. We did not see any errors both in the Drive cointainer and the GUI. We texted the experts. After 15 minutes, we pressed again "ParkIn" (without having touched the fuse). After nothing happend in the GUI, we called the experts. They authorized us to switch back the fuse. After that, still heavy intervention by the experts was needed, who finally made the telescope successfully park (fuse was on during all the trials). Thanks to the experts solving the issue at late night!

  266   Fri Jul 19 23:06:13 2019 Mitsunari, Tomohiro, Satoshi, Moritz, YusukeTelescope OperationsIssuesTelescope stuck in strange state/lost control by Semi-Expert GUI 

Tonight, we tracked Vega to test (a correction of) the pointing offset of the Drive.

Around 22:30UTC, we tried different Az offsets of the pointing in the Semi-expert GUI, followed by taking an image with the PSF camera to see the effect of the offset choice.

We tried delta_az = 0.3°, 0.1°, 0.26°, 0.6°. Strangely, we saw some unexpected (much too large) shifting of the spot for delta_az = 0.3° and delta_az = 0.6° (but looked reasonable for delta_az = 0.26°), which appeared quite puzzling to us (see specific Camera Elog here).

After having tracked with delta_az = 0.6°, we stopped again, and selected delta_az = 0.4°. We submitted the command ("Start"). Some seconds after submission, we became unsure whether we used the right field in the GUI where we entered the delta_az values. We hit "abort current action" (to check our previous command), when probably the slewing to the new offset position wasn't finished yet (about 5 seconds after the previous "Start" command). Then, the GUI became stuck displaying "abort current action", and not displaying the field to enter new positions/targets. According to the GUI, the telescope had in fact stopped tracking, but without any possibility to receive further commands.

We restarted the GUI, but the state remained the same, and checked the telescope outside. Then we called the experts, who could solve the problems after some non-trivial intervention.

  267   Mon Jul 22 23:07:20 2019 Yusuke, Daniel K., Mitsunari, Satoshi, Tomo, Juan Abel, YoshikiTelescope Operations Flywheel PLC down 

After finishing the normal start-up procedure, we tried to park out by GUI, but got an error (22:30 local time): "MSG_WARNINGPark_Out_TimeOut"

The Drive, FSM and Command Statuses were "Parked", "in parking Area" and "No command in progress," respectively.

We closed&reopend the GUI and "Park Out" three times, but everytime got the same error.

We then send a message to the WhatsApp group of Drive experts (22:32).

Thierry asked us to restart the server on 10.1.8.3 and we killed the corresponding process (ps -ef | grep MOS), but the statuses didn't change (still FSM "in parking Area").

Thierry asked us to press the "General Abort" button, but didn't improve the situation.

After Ino's intervention (probably, we don't know detail), Thierry asked us to restart the GUI and we did so. The statuses got improved (Drive&FSM: Parked, Command: Started). So, we pushed the park out button, but the same error happend.

Ino suspected if the telescope wasn't unlocked by ALS, but we could visually confirm the ALSs unlocked the telescope properly.

Ino found the problem that "the Flywheel interlock says no motion allowed so PLC refuse to do Park out". He wanted to see the screen shot of Flywheel page. But, we could not connect to the server 10.1.200.1 which means the Flywheel PLC is probably down.

Daniel M. asked us to go to UC1 and we went there (23:45). After some discussion between Daniel and Ino, they asked us to try "stop" -> "run" -> "reset" in the PLC (lower white one, in the cabinet opposite side of the Flywheels). But, still there was no connection to 10.1.200.1 (also no two LEDs in the right side of the PLC turned on). See attachment 1, the LEDs were ON when it was working fine. Attachment 2 was taken tonight (the LEDs were OFF).

Daniel M. suggested us to close the shop because we need Koji's help to fix this problem (00:01).

Attachment 1: IMG_0165.jpg
IMG_0165.jpg
Attachment 2: IMG_0167.jpg
IMG_0167.jpg
  273   Sun Nov 24 19:33:56 2019 Mathieu David ArmandTelescope OperationsGeneralCDM images for bending model 

- CDM images at park out position.
Exposure 100ms.
OARL on.
Leds 255-200-150-100-50-25-10-1

- CDM image  Az=0 Zd=75-70-65-60-55-50-45-40-35-30-25-20-15-10-5-0
 exposure 100ms
OARL on
Leds On 255

Then we track serie of stars, all affected by clouds unfortunately

- Gamma Peg
- Markab
- Vega
- Altair
- Deneb
For each we took 1 image 100ms led/oarl on + 60 1s images led/oarl off
Then we moved by 2 deg on dark region at took 60 1s images
 

We found out a bug in drive repointing that was affecting the image quality in the first seconds after repositionning. It has been correct in drive SW.

 

 

  274   Mon Nov 25 22:53:22 2019 Mathieu David ArmandTelescope Operations CDM images 19/11/25 
Mg=1.25
DenebDark 60x1s RA-2
TestTracking 60x1s Displacement from Deneb RA-2
Deneb 60x1s
DenebLed 10x20ms Led On OARL On
Zd~32
 
Mg=3.65
OmiAndLed Led Lasers On 10x20ms
OmiAnd 60x1s
OmiAndDark Ra-2 60x1s
Zd~14
 
//====== Not good
Mg=4.75
KsiPegLed 10x20ms
KsiPeg 120x1s 7first Laser On
KsiPegDark 60x1s RA-2
Zd~18
//======
 
Mg=0.03
VegaLed 10x20ms
Vega 60x1s
VegaDark 60x1s RA-2
Zd~60
 
//====== Not good
Mg=5.0
 
HIP89981Dark RA-2 60x1s
HIP89981LED 10x20ms
HIP89981 
//======
 
Mg=4.2
HIP82080LED 10x20ms
HIP82080 120x1s
HIP82080 RA-2
Zd~64
 
// Cloud?
Mg=3.8
LambdaAndLED 10x20ms
LambdaAnd 120x1s
Zd~24
PSF 120s 1574715471
 
Mg=2.9
RukhLED 10x20ms
Rukh 60x1s
PSF 120s 1574715901
RukhDark RA-2 60x1s
PSF 120s 1574716115
Zd~52
 
Mg=4.55
2LacLED 20x20ms
2Lac
PSF 120s 1574716478
2LacDark RA-2
PSF 120s 1574716745
Zd~28
 
Mg=4.05
MirachLED 10x20ms
Mirach 60x1s
PSF 60s 1574717200 => Nice picture of arch and dish through plexiglass
MirachDark RA-2 60x1s
PSF 60s 1574717495
Zd~10
 
Az=-45 Zd=45
PSF 60s 15747178020
 
Deneb
SG images taken by Darko
 
60x20ms LEDs On OARL On
Zd=0 Az=0 
Zd=5 Az=0 
Zd=10 Az=0 
Zd=15 Az=0 
Zd=20 Az=0 
Zd=25 Az=0 
Zd=30 Az=0 
Zd=35 Az=0 
Zd=40 Az=0 
Zd=45 Az=0 
Zd=50 Az=0 
Zd=55 Az=0 
Zd=65 Az=0 
 
  275   Tue Nov 26 21:37:03 2019 David Sanchez, Armand Fiasson, Mathieu De BonyTelescope Operations CDM bending model image 26-11-2019 

The aim was to observe several stars with different magnitude and check the sensitivity of the CDM. We wanted to use a semi-automatic procedure with command sent to the drive via a script to the Acs

After we realized that the telescope was not moving after a StarTracking command we try to use the drive system through the Acs server. StartTracking command not sent to the drive but the other commands (such as StopTracking) worked. 

Instead we used the Semi-expert Gui to make our test. All fine. list of stars observed:

 

AlphaAqr mag 3.11

10 images with LEDs and OARL

100 images + 100 dark

 

Homam mag 3.39

10 images with LEDs and OARL

100 images + 100 dark

 

48-peg mag 3.66

10 images with LEDs and OARL

100 images + 100 dark

 

 

24-peg mag 3.87

10 images with LEDs and OARL

100 images + 100 dark

 

47-peg mag 4.13

10 images with LEDs and OARL

120 images + 120 dark

 

 

17 And mag 4.26

10 images with LEDs and OARL

120 images + 120 dark

 

 

84Peg mag 4.69

10 images with LEDs and OARL

120 images + 120 dark

 

 

56Peg mag 4.91

10 images with LEDs and OARL

180 images + 180 dark

 

 

81Peg mag 5.13

10 images with LEDs and OARL

300 images + 300 dark

 

63 Peg mag 5.70

10 images with LEDs and OARL

400 images + 400 dark

 

 

85 Peg mag 5.87

10 images with LEDs and OARL

400 images + 400 dark

  276   Wed Nov 27 21:27:29 2019 Mathieu David ArmandTelescope Operations CDM & SG images with alternative target 
Test of alternative grey target for the OARL
Warning OARL missing a large fraction of time
===================SG=======================
LED 255
SG images 1s
Good one 1574888127
3s 
Good one 1574884250
5s
Good one 1574884348
 

Few first images at 5s with LED @1

 
LED 1
SG images 1s
Good one 1574884511
3s 
Good one 1574884559
5s
Good one 1574884617
 
=================CDM==========================
LED1
20x1s
20x500ms
20x200ms
20x100ms
20x90ms
20x80ms
20x70ms
20x60ms
20x50ms
20x40ms
20x30ms
20x20ms
20x10ms
 
LED255
20x1s
20x500ms
20x200ms
20x100ms
20x90ms
20x80ms
20x70ms
20x60ms
20x50ms
20x40ms
20x30ms
20x20ms
20x10ms

 

  278   Thu Jan 16 22:06:39 2020 tions applied to solve this issue :Martin Will, Thierry Le FlourTelescope OperationsSoftwareSemi-Expert Drive GUI not connecting / MOS server not workingFixed

In the late afternoon shifters noticed the semi-expert drive GUI was not updating, several restarts did not help. Checking into the issue with the drive team connecting from remote it was found that the MOS server is not running and cannot be restarted. This issue could not be solved and will be revisited tomorrow, Jan 17, during the day.

Actions applied for solving this issue: (T. Le Flour)

The status is the following

  • The MOS OPCUA Server cannot be relauched since the port used by server was not properly released after the last stop.
  • We decided to reboot the VM running on TCS02 but after this operation , the concerned port was still in use.
  • By using the commend lsof , we relased the port and relaunched successfully the server.
  • Actions : releasing the port has been included in the script used to launch the server to prevent such an issue.
Attachment 1: IMG-20200116-WA0020.jpeg
IMG-20200116-WA0020.jpeg
Attachment 2: IMG-20200116-WA0029.jpeg
IMG-20200116-WA0029.jpeg
  272   Thu Sep 19 19:10:39 2019 Martin, Ino, Thierry, Quentin, ThomasTracking Debugging Star images with various Az and Zd offsets 

We tracked stars at various zenith angles and changed the Az and Zd offsets, taking images with the PSF camera for each position. After Armand's changes during the day the offset is the same for all Zenith angles.

Star Zd Az
dAz, dZd image

Polaris 61.5 0.7
0, 0 1568923765.fits
0.5, 0 1568923985.fits
0, 0.5 1568924088.fits
0.5, -0.5 1568924324.fits

Eltanin 29.2 327.9
0, 0 1568924558.fits
0.5, 0 1568924683.fits
0, 0.5 1568924747.fits

Benetnasch 66.6 314.7
Vega 15.6 313.8
0, 0 1568925023.fits
0.5, 0 1568925090.fits
0, 0.5

Kochab 57.3 342.0
Sulafat 8.7 299.5
0, 0 1568925265.fits
0.5, 0 1568925420.fits
0, 0.5 1568925485.fits

Alphecca 52.6 283.0
Arcturus 72.2 282.5
Oph Alpha-55 32.2 246.0
Albireo 1.2 229.1
0, 0 1568925734.fits
0.5, 0 1568925842.fits
0, 0.5 1568925917.fits

Nunki 55.8 190.6
Altair 20.2 168.3
Enif 35.7 115.2
Alpheratz 59.0 71.4
Caph 54.8 35.6
Deneb 21.2 33.9
Polaris 61.5 0.7

ELOG V3.1.4-3d7c366